Sign up to our monthly business and personal security newsletters. Read this SE Labs assessment of world-leading endpoint security products and discover how they handle well-known threats and targeted attacks. Our results help vendors improve their products and buyers choose the best for their own needs. One can also argue that test results are rigged. During Kaspersky's full scan, our benchmark finished in 12.9 seconds, nearly a second ahead of the Bitdefender test and a 26.5 slowdown from the pre-installation baseline of 10.2 seconds. But emsisoft is with 98 Yet bullguard, esan, gdata, qihoo has even lower than 96 gdata, qihoo uses multiple antivirus engine so they must be above or very near bitdefender. This report has gone through the AMTSO certification process to ensure that we say what we’re going to do do it and can prove it. As you can see bitdefender and f secure is a top with 99 detection rate. Windows Defender had an identical percentage score to Bitdefender in AV-TEST’s May-June 2019 testing at 97.1 percent, but had an overall protection score of 6, trumping Bitdefender’s 5.5 score. We pride ourselves on a level of transparency that elevates our work above the less open reports available. This ensures that we do what we say we’ll do, and can prove it. Testing Standardsįor this report we also followed the only available Standard for anti-malware testing, the one run by the Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization. If you want to peak behind the curtain, to see how we work with security vendors, the information is all available online. Hello, I am currently using Kaspersky as my antivirus but Im kinda concerned with Russian companys so Id rather change. In our blog post Public and Private Testing we explain our five simple rules to help maintain the integrity of our reports. We have awards for vendors who do well, but we stand out by assessing technology deeply and helping improve things for everyone. We focus on strong technical testing and avoid purely marketing-led initiatives. One strategy could be to test enough privately against competitors and then release the one report that shows your product at the top of the list. That can involve appearing in weak tests or engaging with more ‘flexible’ testers. Security vendors want to sell products and will do what they can to achieved strong marketing. We need to involve as many reputable security vendors as possible in our tests. So we, as testers, have a massive responsibility to do the right thing. From a customers’ perspective, the wrong decision could be disastrous to a personal life. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. With security testing the stakes are high. How can you trust that the high-scoring vendors didn’t just pay for their ranking? Do you suspect that some low-scoring vendors dropped out of the report? Or asked to be retested until they scored better? What are the rules behind the scenes in security testing?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |